<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zombie Journalism &#187; revenue model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zombiejournalism.com/tag/revenue-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zombiejournalism.com</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the walking dead in today&#039;s &#34;old&#34; media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Newsday is paying for that paywall</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the three months since Newsday put up their pay wall, they've signed up only 35 online subscribers and their traffic has plummeted. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times cheerleaders and other fans of paywalls should take note of the plight of nearby Newsday.</p>
<p>Newsday went behind a paywall for non-subscribers three months ago, They revealed this week that since then, they&#8217;d netted only <a href="http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site" target="_blank">35 online-only subscribers</a>. Ouch.</p>
<p>Newsday was banking on their local news coverage being so important to online readers that they&#8217;d eagerly pay to access it even though there&#8217;s plenty of (free) competition in the NYC/NJ area.. Their redesign made it possible for non-subscribers to see article excerpts, then they&#8217;d have to pay $5 per week to read whole stories.</p>
<p>Because of the low adoption rate so far, the web traffic to Newsday&#8217;s site has, predictable, plummeted.  According to their Nielsen Online analytics, the site&#8217;s page views <a href="http://thenextweb.com/us/2010/01/27/paywalled-news-site-35-subscribers-3-months/" target="_blank">dropped 30% from October to December</a>, meaning that any non-subscription revenue earned from online advertising is taking a plunge.</p>
<p>Their editors don&#8217;t seem to mind &#8211; they say it wasn&#8217;t about numbers and subscribers, but rather about protecting their brand from freeloaders and offering a &#8216;premium&#8221; product to loyal subscribers. While that&#8217;s noble and gutsy, it doesn&#8217;t create any new form of revenue to fund an online product. Food for thought, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
