<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zombie Journalism &#187; content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zombiejournalism.com/tag/content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zombiejournalism.com</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the walking dead in today&#039;s &#34;old&#34; media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Times chose quick bucks over a lasting audience</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times' plan to charge for online content is an act of desperation from a company that chose to abandon a growing audience of dedicated online readers  (and the ad dollars they bring with them) in favor of a quick fix.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New AP plan: Taking web traffic from members?</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/08/new-ap-plan-taking-web-traffic-from-members/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/08/new-ap-plan-taking-web-traffic-from-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the AP's new plan to protect its content shows a bit more online savvy than past declarations, they still don't seem to get why it could be an issue. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/08/new-ap-plan-taking-web-traffic-from-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

