<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zombie Journalism &#187; Online Revenue Models</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zombiejournalism.com/category/industry-news-and-notes/pay-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zombiejournalism.com</link>
	<description>Dispatches from the walking dead in today&#039;s &#34;old&#34; media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New strategy: Berate bloggers, tell online readers to buzz off</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/06/new-strategy-insult-online-readers-and-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/06/new-strategy-insult-online-readers-and-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gannett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McClatchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tbd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zombiejournalism.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure where newspaper execs are getting their PR advice these days, but whoever/whatever it is needs to be fired. The print news sector has put out some head-shaking proclamations this week – all of which have a common theme of holier-than-thou insults directed at online news consumers.</p>
<p>First up is the absolutely appalling handling of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/06/new-strategy-insult-online-readers-and-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enquirer Editor comments on print-first initiative</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/enquirer-editor-comments-on-print-first-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/enquirer-editor-comments-on-print-first-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zombiejournalism.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cincinnati Enquirer editor Tom Callinan has a column in Sunday&#8217;s paper (online now) about the Enquirer&#8217;s evolving First in Print initiative.</p>
<p>He also gives a shout-out to ZJ and its commenters. Check [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/enquirer-editor-comments-on-print-first-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday plan evolves from print-only to print-first</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/sunday-plan-evolves-from-print-only-to-print-first/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/sunday-plan-evolves-from-print-only-to-print-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enquirer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paymodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print-only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zombiejournalism.com/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I wrote first last week about my employer, The Cincinnati Enquirer, experimenting with a print-only strategy for certain stories to boost Sunday single-copy sales.</p>
<p>Not long afterward, I was in a meeting where we decided on the next course of this ever-evolving experiment &#8211; and came up with a conclusion web readers should find a bit more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/03/sunday-plan-evolves-from-print-only-to-print-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Enquirer&#8217;s print-only news experiment</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/cincinnati-enquirer-print-only/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/cincinnati-enquirer-print-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cincinnati enquirer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print-only]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, The Cincinnati Enquirer has been making some stories print-only with the intent of boosting single-copy sales of the Sunday newspaper. Will it work? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/cincinnati-enquirer-print-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker&#8217;s leaving page views behind, so when&#8217;s our turn?</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/gawkers-leaving-page-views-behind-so-whens-our-turn/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/gawkers-leaving-page-views-behind-so-whens-our-turn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pageviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If even Gawker is changing its measure of choice away from the page view to the unique user, when will the rest of the news industry follow suit? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/02/gawkers-leaving-page-views-behind-so-whens-our-turn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsday is paying for that paywall</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the three months since Newsday put up their pay wall, they've signed up only 35 online subscribers and their traffic has plummeted.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/newsday-is-paying-for-that-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT giving lessons in ineffective revenue models?</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/nyt-giving-lessons-in-ineffective-revenue-models/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/nyt-giving-lessons-in-ineffective-revenue-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paymodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has now said that their metered paywall will not apply to blog referrals and searches, which really doesn't seem to make it much of a revenue model at all.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/nyt-giving-lessons-in-ineffective-revenue-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times chose quick bucks over a lasting audience</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times' plan to charge for online content is an act of desperation from a company that chose to abandon a growing audience of dedicated online readers  (and the ad dollars they bring with them) in favor of a quick fix.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/times-chose-quick-bucks-over-a-lasting-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In asking readers to change, will the NY Times change too?</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/in-asking-readers-to-change-will-the-ny-times-change-too/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/in-asking-readers-to-change-will-the-ny-times-change-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most emailed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times announced today that beginning in 2011, it will begin charging online readers for unlimited access to articles. While it's not a bad idea to try out, Times execs will need to readjust their expectations for their online readership stats and change their online content when they go forward with this plan.
 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2010/01/in-asking-readers-to-change-will-the-ny-times-change-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended reading on saving journalism, new technology and social media</title>
		<link>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/12/recommended-reading-on-saving-journalism-new-technology-and-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/12/recommended-reading-on-saving-journalism-new-technology-and-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Revenue Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manjamedia.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;New&#8221; Tools and Technology

Prior to its demise, Editor &#38; Publisher had written about allegedly &#8220;new tools&#8221; the newspaper in Knoxville uses to police website comments. First of all, I find it alarming that anyone, particularly a publication supposedly in the know about our industry, would find this community management approach new or innovative. I say the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zombiejournalism.com/2009/12/recommended-reading-on-saving-journalism-new-technology-and-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

